Composed: Durham, June 1987
Revised: May 1988
Performed: Never. (Almost accepted for Huddersfield CMF (too long); accepted for performance in University of York Music Project, but withdrawn.)
Tape: Recording of MIDI sequence file included
The String Sextet was originally written as an entry for the Huddersfield Contemporary Music Festival's 1987 Composition Competition. It was submitted under the title Still Life.
2.1 Compositional Methods
One of the most interesting influences on the composition of the Sextet was the work I was then doing on Durham's PDP-11 computer. Although usually used to generate sound using the Music 11 programme, I had branched out slightly and was exploring the use of the computer to generate melodic lines from arrays of random numbers. I had become interested in this, not out of any desire to imitate any particular style, (a very complex project primarily involving analytical studies), but from an interest in the use of contour rather than specific melodic sequences as material. This in turn related to an unhappiness on my part with the standard methods of twelve-tone composition, and yet a personal affinity with the use of contrapuntal textures. I was constantly finding the need for sequences of varied yet related melodic streams, primarily for textural purposes. In these circumstances the act of composition itself often 'coloured' the sound of these streams, if only because of the quantity of notes involved and the presence of musical 'ticks' that kept recurring in an unwelcome manner, and yet the desire to escape from the sound of this.
Anyway, the use of 'randomly generated' melodic streams seemed a good solution at the time. As I had no experience of computer programming, I had to go through a number of stages in order to achieve the effect I desired, and one of the interesting parts of the work was finding out just how complex musical 'forms' actually are, and how many things are taken for granted by musicians when composing even the most simple sequences. Obviously, a sequence of random numbers by itself proved very little use. It is one of the features of randomness that although on a 'global' scale, results are predictable and uniform, but on a 'local' level, quite distinctive features appear. These are usually undesirable. The use of the melodic streams was to achieve unpredictable and yet stylistically desirable results.
The first and most obvious stage was to produce 'melodies' of a similar contour. Some of the most basic gestures are patterns of rising and falling intervals, and the nature of these intervals which, in certain styles, are more important than the actual intervals themselves. So, it could be that the three figures given inex 2:1
To begin with, I wrote short programmes to create a number of these 'contours'. A typical example of this might comprise, for instance, fourteen elements: A,B,C...M. A rough contour, (e.g. a composed, (usually 'chorale-type' and quite often with serial 'elements'), might be initially described,(ex 2:2)
A < B < C > D < E < F > G > H < I > J > K < L > M
I initially programmed the computer to look through an array of randomly generated numbers (0-1000) and come up with values that would represent this 'row'. A problem occurred almost immediately. If, for instance, the first value was 990, the next two values could often not be found, (there were no numbers higher than 990 in the array). Alternatively, the programme could produce similar anomalies at any point in the row. The results of this process generally proved to be either incomplete, or highly eccentric. Since I wanted stylistically similar results this was obviously not good.
Gradually it became necessary to be more and more specific about each point:
A > range
x }initial inputs, (i.e., makes sure the initial note is neither too high nor too low)
A < range
B > A
B < (A+A/2) }B is greater than A, but less than 1.5*A
C > A }C is greater than A; the gap between C and B is greater than that between B
(C-B) > (B-A) }and A, but C is not more than 0.75 of the original 'highest point' available
C < (range * 0.75) }according to the 'range' value above.
D < C
(C-D) > ((C-B/2)
D > A }and so on...
E > C
(E-C) > (C-D)
F > E
(F-E) > (E-D)
G < F
(F-G) > (C-G)
H < G
(G-H) > ((C-B) +/- ((G-H)/60)))
I > H
(I-H) > (G-H)
J < I
(I-J) < ((J-H)/3))
K < J
(J-K) > (I-H)
K > (J/4)
L > K
(L-K) < ((J-K)/2)
L < F
M < L
M < K
(L-M) < ((L-K)*2)
This is as far as the process went. Each point has an initial 'contour-reference' relating to the previous point, then a set of criteria for each value. With this programme I was able to achieve virtually any number of equivalent and yet different 'melodic streams', (I wrote another small programme for converting the numeric values into frequencies and then 'pitches'). Ironically, although some of this material was used, it is no longer recognizable as such because of further 'intuitive' editing. Although this calls into question the immediate value of the above programme it has value in as much as it makes an understanding of the varieties of randomness much more clear.
The above work with contours, when seen from the point of view of 'statistical results' had quite clear geometrical ramifications,(ex 2:3)
All the above elements were utilized in the composition of the Sextet. However, there is little direct evidence, as all the processes have gone through a number of stages of intuitive editing.
Pitches were commonly generated using some sort of row, duplicating it, transposing and inverting it, possibly, and then creating a new row by taking a note from each of the derived rows alternately. The process would then be repeated. The lengthy result would then act as a basic supply of pitches, although they were never used with any particular severity or discipline, and the rows would usually be edited according to circumstance. This emphasises the nature of the role of the 'rows', however generated, in my music. They are a means to an end, a way of generating material that can be used as necessary, and, if used, altered at any point to suit other needs. They are not rows in the strictly serial sense, (although they could be used as such if necessary).
There are two main sources of material used in the piece. The first is a row based on the open strings of all the instruments in the Sextet.Ex 2:14
7 5 2 5 2 5 7 7
Matrices may be formed in a number of ways from this:
7 5 2 5 2 5 7 7
6 4 1 4 1 4 6 6
5 3 7 3 7 3 5 5
4 2 6 2 6 2 4 4
3 1 5 1 5 1 3 3
2 7 4 7 4 7 2 2
1 6 3 6 3 6 1 1
7 5 2 5 2 5 7 7
7 5 2 5 2 5 7 7
6 6 1 4 3 4 1 6
5 7 7 3 4 3 2 5
4 1 6 2 5 2 3 4
3 2 5 1 6 1 4 3
1 4 3 6 1 6 6 1
7 5 2 5 2 5 7 7
Matrices such as these provide much basic material for harmony and, more especially, rhythm.
The second main material used is a contour, much as those discussed above. In fact, because of the difficulties involved in manipulating large contours, in the Sextet, six smaller contours are used, which, when combined, form the phrases of a 'chorale'.Ex 2:15
The contours of the opening pages build up to a more specific example of this: the violin solo, (figure J). Here, the first violinist must choose between a variety of 'routes' through the phrases, (six phrases, but D & E are elided). Each phrase is one of the contours in an interpretation of one of the four 'primary' rotations: 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees. The 'vertical' order in which they appear is altered, to aid variation. As can be seen from ex 2:16
An example in which this method is combined with a (multiple) use of the row comes with the passage atfigure T. Here, sustained chords are contrasted with fast, erratic figures. Although distorted by an accelerando, the lengths of the sustained chords outline the row, with bars of 7, 7, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5 and 7 crotchets. Similarly, the erratic interludes are 5, 6, 4, 5, 7, 5 and (originally, though finally extended), 7 quavers: a transformation of the original. In addition, the harmonies of the sustained chords are based on transformations of fifth chords, although these are very hidden, and based around the sequence of open strings descending. So, the 'primary' note of the first chord is E, the second, A, the third, D, and so on. Finally, during the erratic episodes, each instrument outlines a version of the respective contour.
Once again, the methods used here were used to enhance the basic musical idea, rather than dictating it. This passage is the culmination of a vigorous and complex contrapuntal passage, as well as marking a return to the more sustained texture of the opening. The basic idea is primary, not the method.
As usual in pieces of mine with a one movement form, the Sextet is in a very generalABA + coda form. The first A section, which ends with the latter passage, acts as a combination of exposition and organically growing introduction. The B section usually represents a more formally obvious development, often based on or starting from a very different perspective. In the Sextet, which was originally intended to be quite a short piece, this central section was to be a sort of 'cloud' of different materials, connected with what has been heard before. In order to structure the 'internal clouds', a scheme was devised based on six versions each of three different 'clouds', and six more versions of these clouds, each smaller. The smaller versions were used to connect the larger, to give a sense of perspective and movement to the otherwise rather diffuse texture. The final scheme was as follows:
A1 B1 a2 C1 B2 a6 b6 c6 C2 A2 b5 C3 a5 A3 c5 B3 a4 B4 c4 b4 A4 b3 C4 A5 C5 a3 c3 B5 a1
c2 C6 B6 c1 A6 b2 b1 [a]
Arepresents a series of sharp, spiccato and highly rhythmic repeated notes, (based on harmonies derived from the row). B is one or more high, harmonic, unsynchronised attacks. C is a very high semi-pitched collection of varied spiccato fragments. Lower case letters represent less substantial renderings, often forming links between the larger sections. As usual, the scheme deferred to the 'real' composition should problems have arisen.
The final A section of the overall piece usually represents a sort of truncated recap, in which the most important elements of the 'exposition' are re-interpreted in condensed form, often making much more explicit the 'central' ideas. This occurs here. At figure HH the 'recapitulation' starts, emerging from the 'clouds'. There follows brief recapitulations of the opening, (now explicitly based on each instrument's open strings), the solo melody, (now on a viola), and the 'dance' episode, originally fast and frenetic, now slow and sedate. After a brief transition (figure RR) there is a coda based on the 'cloud' material and parts of the 'chorale' combined.
Each passage of the above is constructed in a similar way to the first episodes described. The initial musical idea is planned and then methods are used to complete the detail.
2.3 MIDI Sequence & Graphic Score
As was mentioned in the Introduction, the recording of the MIDI sequence file included is not intended to represent an imitation of the actual sound, merely a guide to some of the basic textures and overall structures. Strings tones, because of their constantly varying structures are difficult both to synthesize and to manipulate via MIDI. In addition, the use of quarter-tones makes a MIDI rendition virtually impossible, as each quarter-tone has to be created using a 'standard' tuned note as a base, and this has to be altered using a separate MIDI control. I have had some doubts as to whether to include this tape or not, but have decided that, bearing all these problems in mind, it has value as a general guide to the composition.
Most of the influences on the Sextet were quite usual for me: Ligeti, (the opening tofigure C is influenced by his String Quartet No 2), and Birtwistle, (the routes and mobiles), as well as the sustained passage at figure T, which now appears to be a fairly obvious imitation of a passage in The Triumph of Time. There are also passages that are reminiscent of electro-acoustic music: elements of Kontakte and The Mask of Orpheus, (the 'interruptions' that occur throughout the latter). Figure A and the rhythmic 'cloud' at figure V are good examples of this.
This is the first piece of the portfolio, and chronologically, it was the first piece to be completed after the MA exercise. It was written over a seven week period for the Huddersfield Contemporary Music Festival Competition, and so it was rather disappointing that it failed to be short-listed, even though, (as was pointed out to me by letter), the piece is too long and difficult to be effective in a short time. This has happened several times to the Sextet since then. It has been short-listed for several events, but withdrawn before any actual performance. This is, no doubt, an indictment of the piece itself, and there is not much doubt in my mind that it is too difficult for what it achieves. It tries to achieve too much, and although there are some very effective moments, there are too few passages of continuous textures for it to develop any real sense of momentum, a concept that was to become increasingly important in future pieces. Since preparing the MIDI sequence file of Sextet, I have had further doubts about the piece, most especially its harmonic and rhythmic complexities. Preparing the file after that for Concertino, I have been able to compare the two, and although the Sextet attempts more in terms of expression and drama, the complexities of the music are far too great for the final result. It shows itself as, quite clearly, an early, inexperienced piece. Although I retain an affection for many of the ideas used, (especially the 'clouds'), the piece as a whole has many faults.